Saturday, May 31, 2008
Potential Concerns Of V-W2
Tending towards full description or definition of a problem, its status as “problem” transposes towards “problem resolved.” To fully understand a question is to comprehend its answer.
OUTLINE –Regarding Stability, Sustainability, and Surpass-ability of Modern Civilization:
I. PAST --- Historical STABILITY:
A. Security (Borders, Patriotism, Language, National Identification)
B. Structure (Energy, Utility Grids, Roads and Dikes, Infrastructure, Satellite Signals)
II. PRESENT --- Present SUSTAINABILITY:
A. Survival (Health, Education, Welfare, Environmental Challenges)
B. Solvency (Jobs, Markets, Business, Productivity, Investment)
C. Sociability (Family, Charity, Church)
D. Service (Environment, Defense, Arms)
E. Subordination (Prisons, Police, Lawmaking, Governmental Organization, Global Relations)
III. FUTURE --- Inspirational SURPASSABILITY:
A. Sacrifice and Spiritualism (Addictions, Self Reliance, Practicing Victimization and Grievance, Privacy)
B. Sport, Song, Serenity, Science (Entertainment, Pursuit of Happiness, Responsible Eugenics and Robotics, Space and Oceanic Exploration, Transcendence)
SUB-OUTLINE:
I. PAST --- Historical STABILITY:
A. Security (Borders, Prisons, Patriotism, Language, National Identification)
1. How should borders be rendered less porous to illegal immigrants, criminals, dope dealers, and terrorists?
2. How should terrorists be beaten effectively, without adopting terrorism?
3. How should military intelligence be gathered, without training agents for turning?
4. How should security be improved by better monitoring or decapitating of gangs?
5. How should morals be inculcated or conditioned, so as to lessen costs of imprisonment and rehabilitation?
6. How should patriotism be better inculcated?
B. Structure (Energy, Utility Grids, Roads and Dikes, Infrastructure, Satellite Signals)
1. How should infrastructure be better secured against vandals, criminals, and enemies?
II. PRESENT --- Present SUSTAINABILITY:
A. Survival (Health, Education, Welfare, Environmental Challenges)
1. How may we achieve decent universal health care?
B. Solvency (Jobs, Markets, Business, Productivity, Investment)
1. How may a Consumption Tax best be substituted for our Income Tax?
2. By what governmental incentives or market regulations should niche filling opportunities for corrupting bargains be counteracted or reduced?
3. How can quality leaders be inspired without having their attention diverted to golden parachutes?
C. Sociability (Family, Charity, Church)
1. How should children be raised and protected?
2. How should polyamory be regulated, recognized, or celebrated?
3. How should gangs, gangsta’ rap, and media glorification of ever more potent hedonistic addictions be reduced?
4. How should civic organizations be encouraged?
5. How should churches be taxed?
D. Service (Environment, Government, Defense, Arms)
1. How should government be limited, so that we are not reduced to having the government pretend to pay us as we pretend to work?
2. How should population growth be better managed?
3. What should be inculcated in respect of responsible civic involvement and/or shifting alliances among policy interests?
4. How can our governance be better defended against overpowering accumulations of aristocratic wealth?
5. How may class warfare (cynical earmark payoffs, poverty pimping, and slogan campaigning) devolved in respect of perpetual campaigning between only two competing political parties be reduced?
6. How can our government become less of a parliament of whores and dunces? (Presently, we have Moe, Larry and Curly chasing each other around the halls of governance while the rest of the country, getting the leadership it deserves, wonders why no great society seems to last very long.)
7. How should we defend against invitations to treason extended to governmental-retiree, revolving door, cashing-in, international lobbyists?
8. How may a more moderate political party ("Red Ass Moderates") gain traction?
9. How can the better candidates be recruited?
10. How should access to automatically repeating arms, guns, and even WMD be regulated and/or limited?
E. Subordination (Prisons, Police, Lawmaking, Governmental Organization, Global Relations)
1. How should we deflate democratic delusions that problems are resolved merely by organizing to enact ever more laws, without need of military, police, or spiritual inspiration or actual service?
2. How should business interests be channeled in respect of national or democratic interests?
3. How should America use tariffs to guide trade policies that are reasonably fair and free?
4. How should global businesses be regulated in interacting among incompatible countries and cultures, so that boundaries are not exposed, as jugulars to predators?
III. FUTURE --- Inspirational SURPASSABILITY:
A. Sacrifice and Spiritualism (Addictions, Self Reliance, Practicing Victimization and Grievance, Privacy)
1. How should academics and teachers lead voters to become less ignorant (and vice-versa)?
2. How should Congress become less impotent for establishing an energy policy adequate to motivate Americans to become less dependent upon OPEC oil and foreign thugs?
3. How should government incentive the production and feasibility of electric vehicles?
4. How can Congress become less afraid to tell voters a truth: That fossil fuels should be taxed high enough to better represent hidden social costs and to encourage development of alternatives?
5. How should voters be lead to become more able to handle the truth?
6. How can society better discredit or at least de-glorify simplistic Marxist notions that still hold sway in our educational system?
7. How may the cost to Americans of providing protection for security lax Europeans be intelligently reduced?
8. How may fascist organizations be stripped of freedom to pretend to be religions?
9. How should scientists and spiritualists be lead not to overstep NOMA?
10. What should be taught concerning Philosophy of the Good; and how far separate should such teaching be kept apart from public schools?
B. Sport, Song, Serenity, Science (Entertainment, Pursuit of Happiness, Responsible Eugenics and Robotics, Space and Oceanic Exploration, Transcendence)
1. How may media be better encouraged not to indulge the lowest common denominator of popular culture for leading sociopolitical voting, buying, interests, and passions?
2. In what should responsible eugenics and responsible robotics consist?
3. How should we cooperate to seek stable and manageable populations, demographics, economies, environments, and fulfillments?
Moral Math
Quantum fuzz is digitially represented epiphenomena of interacting empathy among perspectives of Will, which depends upon perspective of observation, and upon which all other phenomena is derivatively represented.
***
MORAL MATH: A Virtual Walden Two (“V-W2”) should value morphing limits of reductively applied math at least as much as manipulability of models of empirical science.
MORAL DESIGN: Intuitively, an over-arching Designer respects a fundamental inclination, rather than a predetermined path through infinity-eternity.
MORAL FREEDOM: In respect of an overarching Source of empathy for holographic entanglement and meaningful companionship, communication, cooperation, and competition, out of which all design emerges, phases, and morphs, there need not be conceived a predetermined path of physics. Rather, morally free will is expressed in respect of perspectives of parameter potentials.
MORAL HEGEL'IANISM: A concern permeates each of us, some more than others, to intuit and learn how to nourish and/or preserve a civilized society for companionship that is historically stable, presently sustainable, and inspirationally surpassable. Such concern permeates even at subconscious levels, perhaps even at sub-sensate levels. Such concern is for the Hegelian long-term, empathetic benefit of each of us, in all permutations and perspectives, perhaps over all time. Such concern relates to a foundational inclination, or Will, which operates as a synchronized source of entanglement and interaction among all perspectives, guiding empathetic pursuits of all perspectives. Intuitively, each of us represents an essential, innate potential for projecting empathetic appreciation among all, in respect of a purpose of Will for moving us towards Hegelian ends of civilizing histories.
MORAL ESSENCE: Our essence consists in pursuing civilizing utopias; such ever-pursuit is our source of goodness. Although each body seeks to nourish and preserve its physical holography, humanity seeks to nourish and preserve a civilizing holography.
MORAL COMPETITION: We are not automatically good, in ourselves. Yet, idealistic faith in a Source of empathetic soul can lead us in pursuit of fulfillment, which, ultimately, is for the God who functions in regard for each of us. As we move beyond biological evolution into artificially guided evolution, competition focuses among alternative visions and programs for civilization.
Equality merely for its own sake is repulsive to an evolving, morphing, meaningful civilization. Surpassage of the quickest to despair, the slowest to learn, and the least passionate to survive proceeds in respect of a Guiding Source, which models a sort of empathetic pump or historical impatience to evolve towards ever more meaningful sentience.
MORAL CHALLENGE: Finding or creating spiritual forums by which to organize communities, we can, in faith, pit enlightened empathy against merely selfish predators.
PROBLEM: Regarding what is virtuous and beautiful, what ideals and purposes should guide organizations of communities? How should niches be filled or fortified, so that communities do not become organized and over-represented merely by self-aggrandizing grievance-shills and poverty-pimps, who otherwise lack military experience, maturity, discipline, self reliance, or morally empowering insight? How should means morph, in order to promote the better over the base and the enlightened over the Borg?
****
MORAL POWER:
It is not “Science-of-Physics-in-itself” that is awesome or powerful.
What is powerful is “Math as ever leveraged by Will.”
In God’s time, the only Nature needed is Math.
For God, the Truth of Nature consists in Will’s pursuing Imaginations of Perspectives.
Of God, Will is primary power; physics is secondary power, emerging only in respect of Will-To-Math.
Of enlightenment, Physics is Moon; Will is Sun.
In no way does such appreciation diminish the shine (or reflection) of Physics (or Science).
It simply respects glory to the primary Source.
Friday, May 30, 2008
In The Beginning
Politics is broken.
Present lawmakers are too beholden to money.
The logarithmically leveraging computational power of the internet is awesome, yet so far only tritely applied to politics, when measured against the internet's potential.
So, an imaginative ideal for a Virtual City On A Hill, Republic, or Walden Two could easily be leveraged or mobilized, for moving towards decent and civilizing goals, much the same as for an ordinary community.
One could begin simply by listing obvious truths that should be told, as well as needs that Congress has incompetently ignored.
Nearly 9o% of each solution may consist in defining its underlying problem.
Obvious examples of problems:
Why has Congress been so impotent to establish an energy policy adequate to motivate Americans to become independent of OPEC oil and foreign thugs?
Why has government not seen fit to incentive the production and feasibility of electric vehicles?
Why is the American border still allowed to be so porous?
Why is there such utter lack of care for stable and manageable populations, demographics, economies, and environments?
Why is there such disgraceful lack of consideration for what is entailed in caring enough for civilization in order to allow it to become stable, sustainable, and surpass-able?
Why has not every Congressperson every day pressed such obvious questions, looking to the very heart of incompetence of our governance?
Why is Congress afraid to tell voters the truth, that fossil fuels should be taxed high enough to better represent hidden social costs and to encourage development of alternatives?
Why are voters so presently unable to handle the truth?
Why have our academics and teachers allowed our voters to become so ignorant?
Why do so many thinkers in discredited Marxist terms still hold so much sway in our educational system?
Why do so many scientists and spiritualists tend so often to overstep NOMA?
Why is any fascist pretense, such as Islamofascism (I am not speaking here of mainstream Islam), afforded freedom to pretend to be a religion? Surely, not every group of thugs who may worship power, such as power of drugs, should on that basis be afforded religious freedom within the meaning of the free exercise clause of the Constitution to preach and indoctrinate religious soldiers and potential jihadists.
Could not a utopian-minded, academically-inclined coterie of pot stirrers unite to debate and/or adopt actual positions for advocating to lawmakers?
More later ....
*****
CONCERNS:
PAST --- Historical STABILITY: Security (Borders, Patriotism, Language, National Identification); Structure (Energy, Utility Grids, Roads and Dikes, Infrastructure, Satellite Signals).
PRESENT --- Present SUSTAINABILITY: Survival (Health, Education, Welfare, Environmental Challenges); Solvency (Jobs, Markets, Business, Productivity, Investment); Sociability (Family, Charity, Church); Service (Environment, Government, Defense, Arms); Subordination (Prisons, Police, Lawmaking, Governmental Organization, Global Relations).
FUTURE --- Inspirational SURPASSABILITY: Sacrifice and Spiritualism (Addictions, Self Reliance, Practicing Victimization and Grievance, Privacy); Sports, Sirens, Soma, Science (Entertainment, Pursuit of Happiness, Responsible Eugenics and Robotics, Space and Oceanic Exploration, Transcendence).