Saturday, May 31, 2008

Moral Math

"Everything that can be digitized will be digitized."
Quantum fuzz is digitially represented epiphenomena of interacting empathy among perspectives of Will, which depends upon perspective of observation, and upon which all other phenomena is derivatively represented.
***

MORAL MATH: A Virtual Walden Two (“V-W2”) should value morphing limits of reductively applied math at least as much as manipulability of models of empirical science.

MORAL DESIGN: Intuitively, an over-arching Designer respects a fundamental inclination, rather than a predetermined path through infinity-eternity.

MORAL FREEDOM: In respect of an overarching Source of empathy for holographic entanglement and meaningful companionship, communication, cooperation, and competition, out of which all design emerges, phases, and morphs, there need not be conceived a predetermined path of physics. Rather, morally free will is expressed in respect of perspectives of parameter potentials.

MORAL HEGEL'IANISM: A concern permeates each of us, some more than others, to intuit and learn how to nourish and/or preserve a civilized society for companionship that is historically stable, presently sustainable, and inspirationally surpassable. Such concern permeates even at subconscious levels, perhaps even at sub-sensate levels. Such concern is for the Hegelian long-term, empathetic benefit of each of us, in all permutations and perspectives, perhaps over all time. Such concern relates to a foundational inclination, or Will, which operates as a synchronized source of entanglement and interaction among all perspectives, guiding empathetic pursuits of all perspectives. Intuitively, each of us represents an essential, innate potential for projecting empathetic appreciation among all, in respect of a purpose of Will for moving us towards Hegelian ends of civilizing histories.

MORAL ESSENCE: Our essence consists in pursuing civilizing utopias; such ever-pursuit is our source of goodness. Although each body seeks to nourish and preserve its physical holography, humanity seeks to nourish and preserve a civilizing holography.

MORAL COMPETITION: We are not automatically good, in ourselves. Yet, idealistic faith in a Source of empathetic soul can lead us in pursuit of fulfillment, which, ultimately, is for the God who functions in regard for each of us. As we move beyond biological evolution into artificially guided evolution, competition focuses among alternative visions and programs for civilization.
Equality merely for its own sake is repulsive to an evolving, morphing, meaningful civilization. Surpassage of the quickest to despair, the slowest to learn, and the least passionate to survive proceeds in respect of a Guiding Source, which models a sort of empathetic pump or historical impatience to evolve towards ever more meaningful sentience.

MORAL CHALLENGE: Finding or creating spiritual forums by which to organize communities, we can, in faith, pit enlightened empathy against merely selfish predators.
PROBLEM: Regarding what is virtuous and beautiful, what ideals and purposes should guide organizations of communities? How should niches be filled or fortified, so that communities do not become organized and over-represented merely by self-aggrandizing grievance-shills and poverty-pimps, who otherwise lack military experience, maturity, discipline, self reliance, or morally empowering insight? How should means morph, in order to promote the better over the base and the enlightened over the Borg?

****

MORAL POWER:
It is not “Science-of-Physics-in-itself” that is awesome or powerful.
What is powerful is “Math as ever leveraged by Will.”
In God’s time, the only Nature needed is Math.
For God, the Truth of Nature consists in Will’s pursuing Imaginations of Perspectives.
Of God, Will is primary power; physics is secondary power, emerging only in respect of Will-To-Math.
Of enlightenment, Physics is Moon; Will is Sun.
In no way does such appreciation diminish the shine (or reflection) of Physics (or Science).
It simply respects glory to the primary Source.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Re: Free Will: “Of God, Will is primary power; physics is secondary power, emerging only in respect of Will-To-Math”

Brain-Machine Interface Technology:

See http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/29/science/29brain.html?_r=2&scp=2&sq=monkey&st=nyt&oref=slogin&oref=slogin:
“the monkeys’ brains seem to have adopted the mechanical appendage as their own”

Suppose a human experimenter and assistants design a machine for helping a monkey with no arms feed himself marshmallows with a machine which the monkey controls with his mind, through signals sent through connecting electrodes.

As the monkey is stimulated by seeing the experimenter put a marshmallow in the machine, is the monkey’s choice to send a mental signal to feed himself using the machine random (based on cycles of hunger), chosen (based on wishing to experiment with new powers), determined (based on S-R conditioning imposed by the experimenter), or (in respect of parameters affected by a reporter’s purposes and context) some combination thereof?

May the extent of combining of context meaningfully stimulate, effect, and avail a different interpretation of reality in respect of each reporter’s purpose and point of view? Is a different holography of “reality” (with regard to quality of chance, choice, or coercion) presented to each conceptualizing observer?