Living Art

LIVING ART:

Each new idea entertains, alternating as farce and tragedy.
Art helps us imagine beyond what may presently only seem to be limits of physics.
Even so, each expression of Mortal Will is not absolute in all directions, but is bounded in some directions, by anthropocentrically defining limits of physics.
Art consists in what Will “just happens” to find aesthetically pleasing, in association with that which emerges upon Will’s assertion of choices.
Mortal Will attempts to bring choice into manifestation, but is always to some extent surprised, in respect that Will never perfectly or completely succeeds as intended.
When a surprise is aesthetically pleasing or meaningful, it is art.
When not, it is other than art.
Art does not occur in itself as truth or beauty, but in the way in which it moves us towards truth and beauty.

God occupies a heaven in respect of which we serve as change agents for God’s experiencing of different perspectives for chancing, choosing, and coercing the seeking of art.
As mere agents, we are, by birth and death, interchangeable, appreciating turns in transition and/or transcendence, in respect of varying perspectives of kinds and degrees of sensate-ness, sentience, service, supervision, skill, suffering, and splendor.

A sort of algorithmic or exponential leveraging may empower methods or karma by which a present perspective becomes favored, such as for Borg like service, skilled supervision, or self-soothing.

Of holographies pressed by Will-To-Math into perspectives for thinking and feeling, some may become associated towards Borg service, while others may become associated towards conscious appreciation of autonomy --- perhaps alternating, trading places as each wears through its karmic search for fulfillment.

For vintage examples in novels or movies, consider “Foundations Edge” and “The Matrix.” In Foundations Edge, any line between inanimate indifference and conscious sentience was blurry. In The Matrix, nothing precluded any perspective of consciousness from leveraging-up in skill or intelligence, merely by connecting brains to electrodes for inputting or programming additional capacity for memory or knowledge.

Indeed, albeit less immediately obvious, is not such already the existential predicament for every representatively sensate holography? That is, is not Nature already filled with opportunities for alternative transitions and leveragings among expressions of chemically determined inanimates, sensorially random animates, and sentient choosing beings?

This will become clearer as we move towards super data crunching computers, cryogenic and gene therapies for preserving physical youth, polarity induced transmissions of information signals at the speed of light, molecule sized computers, mind to mind transmission of functional signals, programming tricks for drawing on memory and knowledge on a just-in-time and as-needed-basis, and mind expanding methods for projecting sensations of I-ness.

What will result, as self-breeding molecular or quantum sized computers evolve and propagate throughout the Milky Way, becoming as omnipresent (in form ation) as any physical component? Will roles for such omnipresent, interconnected computers be cloaked, sort of like dark matter or energy? May such computers already have been programmed, on a level like quantum fuzz? Will such computer-omnipresence facilitate interaction among brains and minds, without need of connecting electrodes? Will intuitions, insights, prayers, and revelations become interactively appreciated, round trip, two way? Might prayers already be appreciated, one way, sort of like for Harry, from “Third Rock,” receiving incoming messages from The Big Giant Head?

Will experiences of our histories, stories, artistic imaginings, and virtual experiences be broadcast throughout the galaxy? Will we be availed mentally to examine galactic scale art, within our minds, without “physically” even needing to leave our planet? Will choice be availed to various loci of AI — regarding whether to tune in, drop out, or introvert — in order to model and instigate personal hyper-universes or holodecks of imaginative exegesis?

Consider “The Last Question,” at http://www.multivax.com/last_question.html.

Beyond Physics, Movie Sets, and Imagination: A set that is implicated in respect of perspectives for alternating between artistic empathy and empathetic art consists in more than art and empathy. It also implicates an ineffable Will, which is beyond easy or set categorization in respect of any mathematical theory of mutually exclusive and exhaustive elements of sets, or theories of sets as elements of meta sets. Will, like math, is incompletely bounded; that is, math, in some respects, is unlimited and unbounded — not altogether unlike imagination.

Artistic empathy (moral purposefulness) will never be the same.

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/1188828/man_s_creations/